Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Craftsman is more than just about the tools you use

This month I turned a photo of a King George II-style bookcase I found on the Web into a set of woodworking plans using a non-traditional tool, Sketch-Up. Some woodworking purest consider that cheating. But I don't. 

As I continue planning out the build of the new book shelf I discussed last month, I’m reminded of a debate that’s now going on in the woodworking community.

Does the use of new technology like CNC routers, 3D printers, or laser engravers make you less of a craftsman than those people who build their projects in the more traditional manner?

I started wondering about this as I used Sketch-Up, a computer-aid drafting program to render the book shelf I mentioned in my last post in all its 3D glory.

My version of the King George II 
bookcase I created in Sketch-Up
For a long time hand-tool only woodworkers have looked down their noses at people like Norm Abrams who choose to build their projects almost exclusively using power tools instead of hand saws, brace and bit drills, chisels and hand planes. They’ll often say that power tools users like Norm and me don’t really understand how wood works because we don’t get the tactile feedback that cutting or shaping wood with hand tools provide. As a result, our projects are less worthy of praise no matter how well they turn out, because we didn’t build that reproduction chest, table or desk the way the original craftsman of old did.

I always found that logic rather flawed. If the craftsman of the 17th, 18th and early 19th centuries had the kinds of power tools we had today, I’m absolutely positive they would have used them. These people were, after all, businessmen, using their skills to make money to support themselves and their families. And if there was a way to speed up their production so they could make more furniture and earn more money, they certainly would have used it.

So I find it rather funny that some of those same people who defend the use of power tools now look at the use of computer driven routers, 3D printers and other high-tech gadgets as cheating when it comes to woodworking.

To me craftsmanship is not about the tools used to create a project. Nor is it really about the skills used to create it. It’s about the passion, pride and care one puts into building it.

If I’ve learned anything from both my tech and woodworking experience, it’s that any tool, whether manual, powered or computer-driven, takes time to master. Despite what the internet would have you believe, today’s technology doesn’t make using something as simple as just “pushing a button.” (Don’t believe me? Just think of all the time you spent mastering your cell phone, tablet or computer).

For instance, when I got my first table saw and router, I thought I could build projects just as easily as Norm did on “The New Yankee Workshop” because the tool did all the hard work.

Boy was I wrong.

It took plenty of practice and experience before I could use those machines to make the kinds of
joinery that Norm made look so easy. In retrospect, if I had put the same amount of time into mastering hand tools, I could have become as proficient in them as say Roy Underhill, the host of PBS’s “The Woodwright's Shop”  who only uses early American hand tools to create his projects.

My bookcase with it's parts "exploded" so you can see how they
fit together. If 
you look closely, you'll notice that  I'm pretty much 

only using rabbet and dado joints, two very, very basic 
woodworking joinery techniques.
The reason I chose power tools over hand tools came down to time. With all my other interests and responsibilities, I don’t get as much time to play in my shop as I’d like, so whenever I start a project, I need to get it done as fast as possible. Using power tools allows me to complete a project faster than doing everything by hand.

Computer driven equipment is the same. It too has its own learning curve, which in many ways takes more time to learn and master than a “manual” skill like using a hand plane or saw.  For instance at my day job, I’ve been using Adobe Photoshop on and off for over 20 years, and I still consider myself a novice at it. That program is so complex and there are so many ways to do things, I feel like I'm only using it for 1/10th of what it can really do.

I've also found that projects don't always require fancy techniques or advanced skills to look nice and function well. Some of the nicest pieces of furniture I've seen have been constructed with some pretty basic joinery, proving that with just some basic skills you can still produce some fine furniture. As proof of this, just take a look as the Sketch-Up plans accompanying this post. To duplicate that fancy-looking King George II bookcase I'm pretty much only using rabbet and dado joints, two very, very basic woodworking joinery techniques.

So to all you makers out there, who use computers to aid your creative endeavors, don’t let anyone tell you that you’re not a craftsman. As long as you put heart and passion into what you’re building – and you constantly strive to improve your skills – you are a just as much a craftsman as those who stick to more traditional methods.

Saturday, April 30, 2016

Adventures in Woodworking

Over the next couple of months, I hope to chronicle how I build the King George II-inspired bookcase at left to replace our crappy old family room bookshelf at right.
After a long week, I like to unwind and catch up with all the projects my favorite on-line woodworkers have posted on their Youtube channels. I think of this as my own personal Woodworking/Makers TV channel that only airs once a week on late Friday nights/early Saturday morning.

I’m always inspired by the things these people come up with, and just a bit envious of the amount of time they can spend in their shops. I go to bed afterwards with a renewed enthusiasm to not only get into my own shop and build the dozens of projects rattling around in my head, but to start my own Youtube channel and film my own adventures in woodworking.

But by the time Saturday afternoon rolls around, that enthusiasm has faded and after taking care of the 1001 little things that always seem to eat up my free time on the weekends, what little enthusiasm I have left is often killed off having to do yard work. (Forget the robot maid, what I really want is a robotic grounds crew to take care of my yard!)

Not every weekend is like that and I do manage to get a fair amount of shop-time in during the warmer weather here in the Northeast. But trying to film and edit those projects to produce a professional-looking video would just take up too much time I already don’t have.

Rather than just relegating that idea to the “Perhaps Someday” or “When I Retire” pile, I thought I’d try to document a complete project here in this blog.

Lately I’ve been struggling to come with interesting topics for each month’s column, and thought this might help me kill two birds with one virtual stone.

So this month, I’d thought I’d introduce you to the latest project I have in mind: A King George II inspired bookcase.

Since moving into our house 18 years ago, I’ve been meaning to replace a plain, cheap bookcase in our family room with something a bit better.

The particle board shelves have begun to sag under the weight of all the books and chachkies on it, it’s hard dust and all our old record albums are just stored in an old crate on top of it.

The picture of  the King George II bookcase I found while browsing online looks like it could be adapted to hold all of our LPs in the squat cabinet on the bottom, while the glass-enclosed upper section would keep dust and dog hair off the books and chachkies, making dusting much easier. Plus the bookcase would match the style of the furniture in that room much better than the current one does.

So in the coming months, I’m going to cover how I go about turning this picture into a set of working plans in SketchUp (something I don’t usually do), my trials and tribulations trying to find the perfect materials for this (popular?cherry? mahogany?), then detail each step of the build from first cut, to finishing and installing it in the room.

So stay tuned. This should be an interesting ride…..

Thursday, March 31, 2016

Déjà vu all over again


One of the things about being an aspiring writer is that I tend to view life through the filter of a story-teller.

I’m always looking at things going on around me, trying to connect events into a coherent narrative as if I were a character being swept along by events in some Great American Novel.

And aside from the almost constant desire to go back and re-write certain parts of my past to improve that story (and my role as a hero in it), I can’t help but see certain patterns repeating around me.

Perhaps this comes from me being a history geek who has always wished he could hop into a time machine and experience what it was really like to live in whatever era has currently piqued my interest.

Usually these fantasies revolve around wandering down the fog-shrouded streets of Victorian London, getting involved in court intrigues and duels in 17th Century England and France or touring the great castles of Europe during their prime in the Middle Ages.  But since minoring in history in college, the place and time I think I’d really most like to visit is early 20th Century America (1900-1955).

Unlike the other places and times I’ve mentioned, my view of this period of our country’s history is not colored by the mystery stories of Sherlock Holmes, the swashbuckling romance of “The Three Musketeers” or the adventure stories of “Robin Hood,” “Ivanhoe,” or the myriad of Dungeon and Dragon games I’ve played that were set in pseudo medieval settings.

No, my view of early 20th century America is informed though scholarly research I did to earn that minor in college. As a result I can’t help but notice that some patterns that happened at the beginning of the last century seem to be re-occurring at the beginning of this one.

Like the computer/Internet/electronics revolution we’re currently living through, the beginning of the 20th century also saw a great boom in technology. Electricity began phasing out other forms of lighting and power for the home; trains and expansion of the railroads, not to mention the invention of the automobile and airplane, began making once far-away and inaccessible places easier and faster to get to, and the advent of mass-production techniques from the previous century was transforming our sleepy, little agrarian nation into the world’s manufacturing powerhouse.

CREDIT: B.  Deutsch at http://leftycartoons.com/
Then as now, these technological changes brought a great deal of political and social unrest as
new technology replaced many jobs people used to do, rendering their skills almost obsolete overnight. Adding to the turmoil was the throng of new immigrants descending on U.S. cities drawn there by the promise of a better life, which fueled ant he anti-immigrant backlash not really that much different than the kind of hate-filled rhetoric spewed by some of today's political candidates.

Speaking of politics, I see a lot of similarities between the first two decades of the 20th and 21st centuries. As pointed out in the wonderful 2012 History Channel mini-series, “The Men Who Built America” these “Robber Barons” tried to control the political system through their proxies in the Republican Party, and even tried to derail the career of a reform-minded New York politician, Teddy Roosevelt, by sidelining him into what was then thought of as the dead-job of the Vice Presidency of the United States.

Now compare that to the way the Koch brothers are using the Citizen’s United decision, and I think the parallel becomes glaringly obvious.

But the one parallel that’s got me really worried is the one I see between the rise of Hitler in Germany during The Great Depression in the 1930s and the rise of Donald Trump in the aftermath of our own Great Recession.

Yes, I know a lot has been made of this already and I usually try to steer away from politics in my blogs. But as a Jew, I just can’t sit by and watch as another charismatic, demagogue tries to divide our nation under the guise of “Making America Great Again” by demonizing a whole class of people and blaming all our national problems on them.

(I’ve got news for you Mr. Trump. Whatever our troubles may be, this country STILL IS great! That’s why all the immigrants you want to throw out of the country want to come here!)

This is exactly the same tactic Hitler used to gain power. He focused the average German’s pent up frustration over their economic and political situation and turned it against the country’s biggest minority — the Jews.

And when late last year Trump said he’d close down all the mosques and make every Muslim carry an ID card, my jaw hit the floor. Hitler did the same to the Jews, closing all the temples and making them wear a blue, five-pointed star on their clothing with the word “Jude” (Jew in German) stitched on it. I half expected him to go on to suggest we should burn all Qurans and have people smash the windows of Muslim-owned businesses in a 21st century version of Kristallnacht 

How people still cannot see the paralell between the two baffles and worries me.

It also baffles me when an elected official, Roanoke, Va. Mayor David Bowers, can justify the internment of Japanese-Americans in internment camps during World War II as a good thing when comparing it to the current Syrian refugee crisis.  What's even more astounding about this is that Bower's is a Democrat, proving that our foolishness to repeat past mistakes isn't just limited to one of our political parties.

Pardon me, Mr. Mayor. But did you read the same history books I did? Because the use of those camps is considered one of this nation’s most shameful moments! How in good conscience can you even remotely suggest it was the right thing to do? Have you ever spoken to one of those internees? If not, may I suggest, starting with George Takei, Mr. Sulu from  "Star Trek," who has first-hand experience of what it was like to live in one of those camps you blithely called a good idea!

Look, I'm not trying to belittle anyone's political views and I understand today's threats are different from those we faced at the beginning and middle of the last century. But it looks to me like the path we’re heading down is dooming ourselves to repeat the exact same mistakes we made 100 year ago.

We're better than that.

Or at least we should be.

So we all need to stop and take a good long look at our own history, because George Santayana was right.

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Apple Vs. The United States


I’ve never been a big fan of Apple, but in the current controversy over whether the Cupertino, Ca.-based tech company should or shouldn’t give in to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s demand to break the encryption on the iPhone used by the San Bernadino shooters, I find myself decidedly in Apple’s camp.

And you should be too.

Here’s why.

Because despite what the government promises us, this won’t be just a one-time thing.

It just can’t.

Once the genie is out of the bottle, it’s out for good.

Look, I’m not some tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist nor am I a “slippery slope” evangelist. I’m a realist, and know that despite the best intentions of the FBI and all our assorted law enforcement agencies, the congress, the president and even the Supreme Court, there is no way they can control what goes on beyond our borders.

When foreign governments, who may or may not be so friendly to us and our ideals, see this is possible, there is nothing stopping them from demanding Apple do the same for them. After all, if Apple did it once for the United States, how could they then refuse when Russia, China, North Korea or any other repressive state asks them to break into the iPhone of a dissident who they claim is a “a national security risk” for them?

Remember the uproar when Google caved in to China’s demand to censor its Chinese sites back in 2006 after refusing to allow the U.S. Department of Justice to take a peak at what our citizens were searching for here at home?

Yeah, it’ll be exactly like that.

Only worse.

Even if Apple refused to cave to foreign governments, those governments could then turn around and forbid Apple from selling their products and/or services within their borders.  Worse yet, countries like China which have a track record of ignoring patents, could turn a blind eye to enforcing Apple’s trademarked technology, leading to a flood of cheap knock-offs on the market. So in essence this decision by our government could drastically curtail Apple’s pursuit of life, liberty and happiness, which in this case equates to its being a profitable company.

If the government were trying to infringe on the rights of an individual from making an honest living this way, everyone would be up in arms about it. Well, since the Supreme Court ruled that corporations essentially have the same rights as individuals in the Citizen’s United case, the government shouldn’t be allowed to do this to Apple either.

Whether you agree with this line of reasoning or not, you have to admit that the government also doesn’t have control over the hacker community.

Whether state sponsored like China’s elite unit of military hackers, PLA Unit 61398 ; gangs of tech-savvy criminals from Russia and Eastern Europe, or even the media-popularized image of some maladjusted, teenage-computer wizard working out of his parents’ basement or garage, once hackers know a backdoor into the iPhone is possible, they will stop at nothing to try and recreate it.

The potential for profit is just too rich for them to ignore. With over 700 million iPhones sold world-wide hackers would have a virtual shmorgishborg of victims to pray on, pillaging their data for use in identity theft rings, blackmail or ransomware attacks where hackers could break into a user’s phone, re-encrypt it with only a password they know and demand a ransom to unlock the phone.

Don’t think that’s possible?

Neither did Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, until cyber-crooks broke into their computer network and locked them out of all their files until they paid a $17,000 ransom.

If that’s still not enough to convince you, remember that the German Enigma Code  was deemed impossible to crack during World War II, until Alan Turning and his cohorts at Bletchley Park in England figured out how to crack it. And that was 70 some years ago. Now, just imagine how much quicker cyber-thugs could do the “impossible” with today’s technology.

Now tell me how far-fetched it sounds?

Look, I’m not totally unsympathetic to the government’s side. I understand they have a duty to keep us safe and I want them to do that that. I have no desire to be blown up or gunned down by an extremist of any nationality, religion or view while living my day-to-day life. But unlike the scenarios spun by the popular Fox TV show “24,” there is no ticking time-bomb here. The FBI has already admitted that the San Bernadino shooters acted alone and weren’t part of some bigger foreign terrorist network operating inside the U.S. Any threats from these two terrorists died back on that sad day back in December.

If there was any concrete evidence that they were apart of some bigger threat and more shootings or bombing were imminent, I might reconsider my stance. But as it appears now, what the FBI wants is akin to a “fishing expedition,” which as anyone who has watched even one episode of “Law and Order” or any other TV police procedural knows, is illegal.

If Apple gives in, or is forced to give in to this order, then this will be a victory for authoritarian leaders around the world such as Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong-un and a huge erosion of the freedoms we, as citizens of the United States, are promised under the bill of rights.

Like Benjamin Franklin before me, I whole heartily agree that “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Sunday, January 31, 2016

"The Force Awakens:" A New Hope for our dark times?


Since “The Force Awakens” opened a little over a month ago, there’s been one question raging across geekdom that’s been bigger and more controversial than “Who exactly are Rey’s parents?

That question?

Star Wars” or “Star Trek?”

Now, to the average “civilian” this may seem like a rather banal question. But not in the geek world.

Oh, no, no, no!

You are either a “Star Wars” fan or a Trekkie/Trekker, because we geeks live in a world of absolutes and you just can’t be both. Whatever the question, you’ve got to pick a side.

Don’t believe me? Go ahead, walk into any geek bar in the multi-verse and ask loudly, “Marvel or DC?” and see what happens. Just be sure your health insurance premium is paid up first.

This absolutist view of fandom has always bothered me, but lately it seems it’s becoming more rigid and intolerant of differing opinions.

Unfortunately this hasn’t surprised me at all because everyone – geeks and normal people alike – seem to becoming more and more rigid in their world view and anyone who disagrees with them is obviously stupid, ignorant, obnoxious and ugly.

My pessimistic view of things isn’t just from watching our politicians acting like a bunch of spoiled 3-year-olds fighting over whose parents are better than whose, but from reading Sci-Fi/Fantasy forums on the ’Net and seeing the often vitriolic way people go after one another when someone disagrees with a cow another person views as holy.

While pondering how this all came to be, I stumbled on this great article by Charlie Jane Anders  on io9.com about “The Essential Difference Between Star Wars and Star Trek.”

In a nutshell, she says “Star Wars” is really all about “Fighting the Man” (a group of plucky rebels fighting an oppressive, fascist, militaristic galactic empire) while “Star Trek” is about “Being the Man” (The United Federation of Planets and its starships bringing peace, freedom and self-determination to the frontier).

Not only did Charlie Jane hit the nail right on its proverbial head, but her essay also explains why the recent release of “The Force Awakens” has captured the public’s Zeitgeist.

For at least the last decade, if not longer, there’s been an ever-growing distrust of authority. People view the government with suspicion believing its primary purpose is to take away all their freedoms instead of defending them; they see business people as greedy robber barons out to steal every last penny from their pockets; and even doubt the knowledge of our smartest scientists, believing their warnings about the damage we are doing to our environment is just part of some nefarious, hidden agenda. So it makes sense that people would identify with those plucky rebels who are out stop a re-awakened Dark Side from snuffing out their hard-won freedom.

Now I’m not saying we haven’t been given ample cause to distrust all the institutions we used to believe in. Edward Snowden, government dysfunction, The Great Recession, wars in the Mideast and terrorism have given us all plenty of reasons to believe our worst suspicions about these institutions are true. I just don’t remember things ever being this bad.

I was a child during the Vietnam War and Watergate and came of age during Iran-Contra and even then I don’t remember people being so suspicious of government. Even in the midst of those scandals and the realization we’d lost a major war, people still believed that, at heart, our government was a beacon of freedom and liberty for all the world. Despite a nearly crippling oil embargo, super high inflation, and a presidential extended family that seemed to come straight out of “The Beverly Hillbillies,” people still believed our brand of government was invulnerable to the hatred, fear, suspicion and anger that lead to the rise of regimes like the Nazis, Stalinist Russia or any other, oppressive, totalitarian government.

So what’s happened since to erode our national morale?

I’m sure there are many different answers to this question, each as valid as the next. But as curious as I am to figure out how we got here, I’m more interested in the way we break out of this dark time of distrust in everyone and everything so we can start building that optimistic, utopian future that was the hallmark of “Star Trek.”

Ironically, when the first “Star Wars” came out in 1977, the United States was in another funk as it looked like our influence over the world and status as a superpower was on the wane. Yet somehow, a silly little sci-fi film, managed to give the nation, and perhaps even the world, “A New Hope” and helped set the stage for the rejuvenation of both our spirit and the economy in the “Go-Go ’80s.”

Here’s hoping General Leia, Luke, Rei, Finn and Po and their band of brave Resistance fighters can again help us conquer our dark time of distrust and once again bring hope and optimism back to the universe nation.




 

Thursday, December 31, 2015

Nix Negativity for New Year's


This time of year is all about looking back at the last 12 months, trying to compile things into nice, neat lists to help us summarize the year that was.

And believe me there is nothing geeks like me like doing more than dissecting and examining their obsessions in minute detail, rating them and then having heated arguments about those ratings with their geeky friends

But I’m not going to do that.

Why?

Because there are plenty of other sites out there on the Internet where you can read that kind of stuff.

Plus, I also find it kind of boring.

Now I like a good esoteric debate about the merits – or lack there of – of fictional worlds, characters, starship design, weapons and tactics as much as the next geek. I’ve even been known to engage in an hours-long discussion of why the TARDIS is a cooler time machine than the DeLorean from “Back to the Future.” (Hey, it’s bigger on the inside than the outside, can travel in both outer space as well as time, and has its own swimming pool!) But I’ve grown kind of tired of the negativity expressed on those Internet forums.

Look, I get it that we geeks are a passionate group, but the amount of vitriol people spew out about things they dislike gets me upset and depressed. Sometimes it seems like these rants are personal attacks on people who dare to have a contrary opinion. Even more upsetting than this growing lack of respect for those with differing points of view is that all some people want to do is tear things down.

Whatever happened to exploring how things could have been made better?

As a writer, I want people to critique my work. But I want them to tell me more than just what I did wrong. Tell me why you think it didn’t work and exactly how you think it could have been made better.

It’s called positive or constructive criticism and shows a person put a lot more thought into their review.  It’s easy to point out a work’s flaws, especially when they are glaringly obvious (cough, cough, Jar Jar Binks cough, cough). But it takes more time and effort to examine a work, look at its themes and ideas and figure out ways that they could have been expressed better.

So I’m going to ask everyone who is reading this post to make a New Year’s Resolution to be a lot less negative next year. Try not to solely focus on what made something so bad. Try and figure out what could have been done to make it better, and let others know in a positive, constructive way.

And maybe, just maybe, if we’re lucky, that positive attitude will begin to rub off on others, leading to a brighter, more optimistic future for us all.

Happy New Year!

Monday, November 30, 2015

Best holiday gift is realizing what great gifts I already have


It has come as something of a surprise to me that the older I get, the less stuff I seem to want.

I had this revelation when my wife recently asked me for my annual holiday gift list and I had to keep putting her off because I really didn’t know. This isn’t the first time this has happened either.  When she asked me what I wanted for our anniversary this year and what I wanted for my 50th birthday, I was equally at a loss of what to tell her.

In the past I’ve had lists of gadgets and tools that would fill a small notebook.

But now, not so much. Besides for the usual thing I ask for every year – a heated space for my now 25-foot by 25-foot woodworking shop (hey, I turned 50 this year and two 25s equal 50!) – I had to struggle to come up with a dozen or so things that I thought would be kind of nice to have.

Yes there are a few other ridiculously expensive things I like to have, like this CNC Router setup or a MakerBot 3-D printer  but the truth of the matter is once the novelty of having one of these devices wears off, I don’t really know how much I’d actually use them.

Even the one sub $1000 tool I’ve been thinking about for years, the Festool Domino Joiner DF, isn’t on my “absolutely must-have” list. While it would make making mortise and tenon joints real easy, it is not like:

A) I make a lot of furniture, cabinets or other stuff that require that joint
B) Don’t have other ways to make that particular jointed if I wanted to/needed to
And 
C) Don’t have another tool, a biscuit joiner, which can accomplish nearly the same thing.

Whether or not having a tool that makes making those joints quicker and a lot easier would mean I’d use them more often is a good question. But in the types of builds I mostly do, I just don’t know.

This lack of desire for expensive gadgets even extends into my tech life. I work with all sorts of computers and tech all day (and sometimes well into the evening) and while I enjoy playing with cool new stuff, none of it leaves me with an overwhelming desire to have it.

My computers and laptops, while old by today’s standards, still are capable of running modern software and perform at acceptable speeds for the kinds of things I do, so I don’t need to replace or upgrade any of them. Even my ancient versions of Quark and Photoshop are fine for the type of things I use them for, so I can’t see spending the money on a $39/month Adobe Creative Suite subscription

My phone is supplied by work and upgraded every few years without cost to me and my old Sony Alpha DSLR is still a better camera than I will ever be as a photographer, so why should I replace it?

Yes it doesn’t shoot video, let alone HD video, but I don’t really need that.

Not yet anyway.

While I’ve considered starting my own Youtube channel, I just don’t have the time to create the type of professional-looking content I think people would enjoy. Hell, I barely have time to write this monthly blog!

About the only tech gadget that even  piqued my interest, recently was one of those fitness bands. But as I stated in my rant about smart watches,  they don’t offer that much more than the activity monitoring app on my cell phone does, so I think I just stick to my old analogue watch.

Most of the reasons I don’t actively desire any of these things the way I used to comes down to the fact that I don’t really need them the way I used to think I did. The things I have will generally do the same things as any of the newer stuff I might want. It just might take a bit more work, ingenuity, time or all three.

And that in turn lead me to another surprising, yet timely realization.

That I already have all the important gifts a person can have:

  • A wife and family who love me and want to make me happy by trying to get me the stuff I really want.
  • Good friends who get me and my odd humor, inspire me, stand by me in good times and bad,  and when needed, kick me in the butt and tell me to get-over-myself.
  • A job I mostly enjoy that allows me to keep a roof over my head and a full – and unfortunately expanding – belly.
  • A workshop full of tools and computers that help me express my creativity.
  • And the realization that I’m better off than probably 95 percent of the world population.

So that’s why I had trouble making a list. In the midst of such precious gifts, who could really want anything more?

Yet not to upset her, I did manage to cobble together a list containing a few odds and ends that would be kind of nice (but not important) to have:


  • Samsung UN55JS8500 55-Inch 4K Ultra HD 3D Smart LED TV (2015 Model). Okay, I know that after this long essay about being thankful for the all the gifts I already have, putting an expensive HDTV on the list seems hypocritical. And you’re right. It is. But I don’t actually expect anyone to get this for me as our current old-fashioned tube TV is just fine. It’s just one of those guy things that would be cool to have and something I KNOW I would use a regular basis. Plus, you could count it as my holiday, Valentine’s Day, Anniversary and birthday gift this year and get your shopping done all at once! $1,500 at Amazon.com 

  • Button front Fencing Jacket. After looking around for years I think I’ve finally found a place that actually still makes them. My current jacket is Size 40, I’m right handed and would prefer button closure. Color: White (preferred) with a second choice of Steel Blue. Zen Warrior Armory (Triplette Competition Arms) $82.50 
  • 15 gallon drum. It’s an unusual request, but I’ve been thinking about converting my single stage dust collector into to two stage unit and have never gotten around to getting one of these to do it. So if you so desire, you could get me one to finally get me started on this project I’ve been thinking about for a year or two. I need a small barrel with a resealable lid and this one’s small enough (20” high and 16” wide) to fit under my current dust collector. You probably get them other places cheaper, this one on Amazon will give you an idea of the kind I’m looking for. $38 
  • Norton Waterstone Sharpening Combination Package. I debated putting this on my list because I’m not really into sharping, but I’ve been using a lot more hand tools lately (chisels and hand planes) so eventually, I’ll need to sharpen them.  Peachtree Woodworking $140 
  • iOttie Easy One Touch 2 Car Mount Holder for my cell phone when I decide to use it as a GPS. Sometimes my phone is more accurate than my dedicated GPS unit. Besides, my dedicated GPS unit doesn’t stick to my windshield anymore. $14 
  • Woodworking clamps. This is always a good default gift as woodworkers can never have too many of these. K-Body, bar, pipe or Quick-type are acceptable. 24” or bigger preferred. Your favorite big-box store or online. Price varies by type, but this link should give you an idea.